Remembering the Ancestors. A Grave-Marker from the “Scythian” Cemetery at Sâncrai
(Alba County)

RUSTOIU, AUREL; DRĂGAN, ANDREEA

EPHEMERIS NAPOCENSIS 32 (XXXII/2022)

Remembering the Ancestors. A Grave-Marker from the “Scythian” Cemetery at Sâncrai (Alba County)

(pages 171-192)

DOI: https://doi.org/10.33993/ephnap.2022.32.171

Download PDF

Authors:
AUREL RUSTOIU
Academia Română, filiala Cluj-Napoca. Institutul de Arheologie și Istoria Artei. Str. M. Kogălniceanu 12–14, 400084 Cluj-Napoca, Romania. E-mail: aurelrustoiu@yahoo.com

ANDREEA DRĂGAN
Academia Română, filiala Cluj-Napoca. Institutul de Arheologie și Istoria Artei. Str. M. Kogălniceanu 12–14, 400084 Cluj-Napoca, Romania. E-mail: andreea.dragan@yahoo.com

Keywords: “Celts”, “Scythians”, archaeology of remembrance, Transylvania, cemeteries, funerary rituals, archaeological landscapes.

Abstract
Mobility, migration, and conquest of endless horizons ... they have all been, since the beginning, essential traits of human existence. That is why the way different identity constructs were transformed or emerged as a consequence of local, regional or long-distance human mobility and migration has been an important research topic for social sciences. The purpose of this article is to see how the memory of the ancestors was reinterpreted and used in the process of reshaping collective identities triggered by the “Celtic” colonisation of Transylvania in the 4th century BC, and to determine the role it played in the interaction with the indigenous “Scythian” populations. Within this framework, the paper also includes a case study about the concrete ways of communicating the memory of the ancestors from one generation to another. In Transylvania, the “Scythian” horizon is represented by cemeteries with flat inhumation burials, and rarely cremations, which were recently dated to the 8th–5th / 4th centuries BC. The evolution of these communities was interrupted after the middle of the 4th century BC by the arrival of “Celtic” groups coming from the west. Their arrival determined a social reconfiguration of many local communities, as well as the appearance of new communities which displayed various degrees of cultural hybridisation. In several cases from the same region, the newcomers reused the funerary grounds which previously belonged to the local communities. Earlier burial grounds more likely became places of memory integrated into the local collective identity as symbolic references to a mythical past, providing a physical connection with the ancestors. Their later reuse reflects the cohabitation of the newcomers with the locals, as well as the will of the former to incorporate identity markers which were relevant in the local environment into the identity constructs of the newly established communities as a means of legitimisation. Grave no. 9/2020 from Sâncrai is one example of the manner in which the memory of the ancestors was passed down over time across generations.

References:

[1] ALEKSEEV ET AL. 2001
A. YU. ALEKSEEV ET AL., A chronology of the Scythian antiquities of Eurasia based on new archaeological and 14C data. Radiocarbon 43, 2B, 2001, 1085–1107.

[2] ALEKSEEV ET AL. 2002
A. YU. ALEKSEEV ET AL., Some problems in the study of the chronology of the ancient nomadic cultures in Eurasia (9th–3rd centuries BC). Geochronometria 21, 2002, 143–150.

[3] ALFSDOTTER/PETAROS 2021
C. ALFSDOTTER/A. PETAROS, Outdoor human decomposition in Sweden: A retrospective quantitative study of forensic-taphonomic changes and postmortem interval in terrestrial and aquatic settings. Journal of Forensic Sciences 66, 2021, 1348–1363. Doi: https://doi. org/10.1111/1556–4029.14719

[4] BABEȘ/MIRIȚOIU 2011
M. BABEȘ/N. MIRIȚOIU, Practici funerare birituale prelungite în spaţiul carpato-dunărean în secolele V–III a. Chr. Arheologia Moldovei 34, 2011, 103–149.

[5] BABEȘ/MIRIȚOIU 2012
M. BABEȘ/N. MIRIȚOIU, Verlängerte, mehrstufige birituelle Bestattungen im Donau– Karpaten-Raum (5. bis 3. Jh. v. Chr.). In: S. Berecki (ed.), Iron Age Rites and Rituals in the Carpathian Basin. Proceedings of the International Colloquium from Târgu Mureş, 7–9 October 2011 (Târgu Mureş 2012), 139–159.

[6] BĂLAN ET AL. 2015
G. BĂLAN/R. BURLACU-TIMOFTE/R. OTA/T. MUNTEAN/M. RÂZA/O. OARGĂ/ D. ANGHEL, Raport preliminar cu privire la săpăturile arheologice preventive întreprinse la Gâmbaş – sit 2. Apulum 52, 2015, 133–179.

[7] BÂRCĂ 2011–2014
A. BÂRCĂ, Cimitirele bisericilor de lemn din Breb și Ieud, jud. Maramureș. Revista Monumentelor Istorice 58, 1–2, 2011–2014, 43–55.

[8] BERECKI 2015
S. BERECKI, Iron Age Settlement Patterns and Funerary Landscapes in Transylvania (4th–2nd centuries BC) (Târgu Mureş 2015).

[9] BERECKI 2021
S. BERECKI, Identity in Landscape. Connectivity and Diversity in Iron Age Transylvania. (Cluj-Napoca 2021).

[10] BRENT 2017
L. BRENT, Disturbed, damaged, and disarticulated: grave reuse in Roman Italy. Theoretical Roman Archaeology Journal 2016, 37–50. Doi: https://doi.org/10.16995/TRAC2016_37_50

[11] BUJNA 1989
J. BUJNA, Das latènezeitliche Gräberfeld bei Dubnik. I. Slovenská Archeológia 37, 2, 1989, 245–347.

[12] CIUGUDEAN 1976
H. CIUGUDEAN, Cultura Basarabi pe teritoriul judeţului Alba. Apulum 14, 1976, 9–22.

[13] CRUBÉZY 2007
E. CRUBÉZY, Chamane Kyys, la jeune fille des glaces. L’Archéologue 90, 2007, 36–39.

[14] CRUBÉZY ET AL. 2017
E. CRUBÉZY/P. GÉRARD/N. KIRIANOV/V. POPOV/D. NIKOLAÏEVA/C. PETIT/ M. PE TIT/L. ROMANOVA/C. KEYSER/B. LUDES/O. MELNITCHOUK/R. BRAVINA/A. AL EXEEV/S. DUCHESNE, The relationship between Archaeology, Genetics, Ethnology and History. Reflections on a 2002–2015 study in Yakutia (1632- 1922). In: J.-M. Blaising/J. Drie ssen/J.-P. Legendre/L. Olivier (eds.), Clashes of time. The contemporary past as a challenge for archaeology (Louvain 2017), 121–138.

[15] CUNLIFFE 2019
B. CUNLIFFE, The Scythians. Nomad warriors of the steppe (Oxford 2019).

[16] DÍAZ-ANDREU 2005
M. DÍAZ-ANDREU, Gender identity. In: M. Díaz-Andreu/S. Lucy/S. Babić/D. Edwards (eds.), The archaeology of identity. Approaches to gender, age, status, ethnicity and religion (Oxford 2005), 13–41.

[17] DOBOS 2014
A. DOBOS, Plunder or ritual? The phenomenon of grave reopening in the row-grave cemeteries from Transylvania (6th–7th centuries). Annales Universitatis Apulensis. Series Historica 18.II, 2014, 135–162.

[18] EL SUSI 2021
G. EL SUSI, Comparative archaeozoological study between sites and complexes from the “Scythian”, “Celtic” and “Dacian” horizons by regions and chronological periods. In: A. Rustoiu/M. Egri (eds.), Community dynamics and identity constructs in the eastern Carpathian Basin during the Late Iron Age. The impact of human mobility (Cluj-Napoca 2021), 165–210.

[19] FAHLANDER 2010
F. FAHLANDER, Messing with the dead: post-depositional manipulations of the burials and bodies in the South Scandinavian Stone Age. Documenta Praehistorica 37, 2010, 23- 31. Doi: https://doi.org/10.4312/dp.37.2

[20] FERNÁNDEZ-GÖTZ 2014
M. FERNÁNDEZ-GÖTZ, Identity and Power: The Transformation of Iron Age Societies in Northeast Gaul (Amsterdam 2014).

[21] GIVEN 2004
M. GIVEN, The Archaeology of the Colonized (London 2004).

[22] GOSDEN 2004
C. Gosden, Archaeology and Colonialism. Cultural Contact from 5000 BC to the Present (Cambridge 2004).
[23] GRUEN 2011

E. S. GRUEN, Cultural identity in the ancient Mediterranean (Los Angeles 2011).
[24] INSOLL 2007

T. INSOLL, The Archaeology of Identities. A Reader (London 2007).
[25] IVANTCHIK 2005

A. IVANTCHIK, La chronologie des cultures Pré-Scythes et Scythes: les données Procheorientales et Caucasiennes. Iranica Antiqua 40, 2005, 447–460.

[26] IVANTCHIK 2010
A. IVANTCHIK, Un choc des civilisations au VIIe s.: Les invasions des Cimmériens et des Scythes au Proches-Orient et les origines de la culture Scythes. In: R. Etiénne (ed.), La Méditerranée au VIIe s. av. J.-C. (essays d’analyse archéologiques) (Paris 2010), 38–49, 55–57.

[27] JONES 2007
A. JONES, Memory and material culture (Cambridge 2007).

[28] MURPHY 2008
E. M. MURPHY, Introduction. Deviant burial in the archaeological record. In: E. M. Murphy (ed.), Deviant burial in the archaeological record (Oxford 2008).

[29] NEUGEBAUER 1996
J.-W. NEUGEBAUER, Eine frühlatènezeitliche Gräbergruppe in Inzersdorf ob der Treisen, NÖ. In: E. Jerem/A. Kreen-Leeb/J.-W. Neugebauer/O. H. Urban (eds.), Die Kelten in den Alpen und an der Donau, Akten des Internationalen Symposion St. Pölten, 14.–18. Oktober 1992 (Budapest – Wien 1996), 111–178.

[30] PAPP ET AL. 2022
M. PAPP ET AL., The importance of pine species in the ethnomedicine of Transylvania (Romania). Plants 11 (18), 2022, 2331, 1–21. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11182331

[31] RAMSL 2011
P. C. RAMSL, Das latènezeitliche Gräberfeld von Mannersdorf am Leithagebirge, Flur Reinthal Süd, Niederösterreich (Wien 2011).

[32] RAMSL 2012
P. C. RAMSL, Two stone stelae from the La Tène cemetery at Mannersdorf am Leithagebirge, Remembering the Ancestors. A Grave-Marker from the “Schythian” Cemetery at Sâncrai 189 Flur Rheinthal süd. In: P. Anreiter et al. (eds.), Archaeological, cultural and linguistic heritage. Festschrift for Erzsébet Jerem in Honour of her 70th Birthday (Budapest 2012), 499–507.

[33] RÖSCH 1999
M. RÖSCH, Evaluation of honey residues from Iron Age hill-top sites from southwestern Germany: implications for local and regional land use and vegetation dynamics. Vegetation History and Archaeobotany 8, 1999, 105–112.

[34] ROYMANS 2004
N. ROYMANS, Ethnic Identity and Imperial Power: The Batavians in the Early Roman Empire (Amsterdam 2004).

[35] RUSTOIU 2008
A. RUSTOIU, Războinici şi societate în aria celtică transilvăneană. Studii pe marginea mormântului cu coif de la Ciumeşti (Cluj-Napoca 2008).

[36] RUSTOIU 2012
A. RUSTOIU, The Celts and Indigenous Populations from the Southern Carpathian Basin. Intercommunity Communication Strategies. In: Berecki, S. (ed.), Iron Age Rites and Rituals in the Carpathian Basin. Proceedings of the International Colloquium from Târgu Mureş, 7–9 October 2011 (Cluj-Napoca – Târgu Mureş 2012), 357–390.

[37] RUSTOIU 2014
A. RUSTOIU, Indigenous and colonist communities in the Eastern Carpathian Basin at the beginning of the Late Iron Age. The genesis of an Eastern Celtic World. In: C. N. Popa/S. Stoddart (eds.), Fingerprinting the Iron Age. Approaches to Identity in the European Iron Age. Integrating South-Eastern Europe into the Debate (Oxford 2014), 142–156.

[38] RUSTOIU 2016
A. RUSTOIU, Some questions regarding the chronology of La Tène cemeteries from Transylvania. Social and demographic dynamics in the rural communities. In: S. Berecki (ed.), Iron Age Chronology in the Carpathian Basin. Proceedings of the international colloquium from Târgu Mureş 8–10 October 2015 (Cluj-Napoca 2016), 235–264.

[39] RUSTOIU 2019
A. RUSTOIU, Archaeological explorations of magic and witchcraft in Iron Age Transylvania (Cluj-Napoca 2019).

[40] RUSTOIU ET AL. 2017
A. RUSTOIU ET AL. 2017, Sâncrai. Cronica Cercetărilor Arheologice din România – Campania 2016 (București 2017), 210–211.

[41] RUSTOIU ET AL. 2021
A. RUSTOIU ET AL. 2021, Sâncrai. Cronica Cercetărilor Arheologice din România – Campania 2020 (București – Sibiu 2021), 255–257.

[42] RUSTOIU ET AL. 2022
A. RUSTOIU ET AL. 2022, Sâncrai. Cronica Cercetărilor Arheologice din România – Campania 2021 (București – Oradea 2022), 318–320.

[43] RUSTOIU/BERECKI 2016
A. RUSTOIU/S. BERECKI, Cultural encounters and fluid identities in the eastern Carpathian Basin in the 4th–3rd centuries BC. In: I. Armit et al. (eds.), Cultural Encounters in Iron Age Europe. Arheolingua, Series Minor 38 (Budapest 2016), 285–304.

[44] RUSTOIU/BERECKI 2018
A. RUSTOIU/S. BERECKI, Symbols of status and power in the everyday life of Late Iron Age Transylvania. Shaping the landscape. In: I. V. Ferencz/O. Tutilă/N. C. Rișcuța (eds.), Representations, signs and symbols. Proceedings of the Symposium on Life and Daily Life (Cluj-Napoca 2018), 65–78.

[45] RUSTOIU/EGRI 2020
A. RUSTOIU/M. EGRI, The dynamics of collective identities and cultural encounters in the eastern Carpathian Basin during the Late Iron Age. In: G. Pierrevelcin/J. Kysela/S. Fichtl (eds.), Unité et diversité du monde celtique – Unity and Diversity in the Celtic World, Actes du 42e colloque international de l’AFEAF, Prague, 10–13 mai 2018. Paris-Prague 2020, 449–468.

[46] RUSTOIU/EGRI 2021
A. RUSTOIU/M. EGRI (eds.), Community dynamics and identity constructs in the eastern Carpathian Basin during the Late Iron Age. The impact of human mobility (Cluj-Napoca 2021).

[47] TANKÓ ET AL. 2016
K. TANKÓ/Z. TÓTH/L. RUPNIK/Z. CZAJLIK/S. PUSZTA, Short report on the archaeological research of the Late Iron Age cemetery at Gyöngyös. Dissertationes Archaeologicae ex Instituto Archaeologico Universitatis de Rolando Eötvös Nominatae Ser. 3, 4, 307–324.

[48] VADAY 2006
A. VADAY, The chronological model of the Celtic cemetery of Ménfőcsanak. In: V. Sîrbu/D. L. Vaida (eds.), Thracians and Celts. Proceedings of the International Colloquium from Bistriţa, 18–20 May 2006 (Cluj-Napoca 2006), 279–294.

[49] VAN DYKE/ALCOCK 2003
R. M. VAN DYKE/S. E. ALCOCK, Archaeologies of memory: an introduction. In: R. M. Van Dyke/S. E. Alcock (eds.), Archaeologies of memory (Oxford 2003), 1–14.

[50] VASILIEV 1976
V. VASILIEV, Necropola de la Băiţa şi problema tracizării enclavei scitice din Transilvania. Marisia 6, 1976, 49–87.

[51] VASILIEV 1980
V. VASILIEV, Sciţii agatârşi pe teritoriul României (Cluj-Napoca 1980).

[52] VASILIEV/ALDEA/CIUGUDEAN 1991
V. VASILIEV/I. AL. ALDEA/H. CIUGUDEAN, Civilizația dacică timpurie în aria intracarpatică a României. Contribuții arheologice: așezarea fortificată de la Teleac (Cluj- Napoca 1991).

[53] VULPE 1984
A. VULPE, 1984. Descoperiri hallstattiene din zona Aiudului. Thraco-Dacica 5, 1984, 36–63.

[54] WEISS-KREJCI/BECKER/SCHWYZER 2022
E. WEISS-KREJCI/S. BECKER/PH. SCHWYZER, Interdisciplinary Explorations of Post-mortem Interaction. Dead Bodies, Funerary Objects, and Burial Spaces Through Texts and Time (Cham 2022). Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978–3-031-03956-0

[55] WENDLING 2020
H. WENDLING, Iron Age Ancestral Bonds: Consecutive Burials and Manipulated Graves at the Dürrnberg Cemeteries (Austria). In: E. Aspöck/A. Klevnäs/N. Müller- Scheeßel (Eds.), Grave disturbances. The archaeology of post-depositional interactions with the dead. Studies in Funerary Archaeology 14 (Oxford 2020) 157–174.

[56] WERNER 1988
M. WERNER, Eisenzeitliche Trensen an der unteren und mittleren Donau. PBF XVI/4 (München 1988).

[57] WILLIAMS 2003
H. WILLIAMS, Introduction. The Archaeology of Death, Memory and Material Culture. In: H. Williams (ed.), Archaeologies of Remembrance. Death and Memory in Past Societies (New York-Boston-Dordrecht-London-Moscow 2003), 1–24.

EPHEMERIS NAPOCENSIS

Issues

Remembering the Ancestors. A Grave-Marker from the “Scythian” Cemetery at Sâncrai (Alba County)