logo

EPHEMERIS NAPOCENSIS

Home Aims and scope Editorial board Editorial process Instructions for authors Volumes Other publications Contact
Issues

EPHEMERIS NAPOCENSIS 31 (XXXI/2021)

Corrigenda Porolissensia (II). Authentic, or Forgery? Critical Analysis of Some Early Christian Evidence at Porolissum

(pages 259-274)

DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.33993/ephnap.2021.31.259

_ Download PDF

Authors:
CORIOLAN HORAȚIU OPREANU
Institute of Archaeology and History of Art, Romanian Academy Cluj Branch, Mihail Kogălniceanu Str. 12‑14 400084 Cluj‑Napoca, Cluj County, RO, e‑mail: choprean@yahoo.com

Keywords: Porolissum, forgery, Early Christian inscriptions, Christian Basilicas, chronology.

Abstract
The author briefly presents some famous forgeries in Roman archaeology and epigraphy starting from the Renaissance till to the 21 st century. After this introduction he is reanalyzing a Roman shard from Porolissum having incised after burning signs and letters interpreted several times as Early Christian symbols and texts. The author carefully examines the find starting from the unknown conditions of discovery, till to the interpretation of the texts. His conclusion is that the signs and inscriptions are not authentic, but it is a forgery not identified by the archaeologists of the period. In a second part of the study the author is debating other two false interpretations of two Roman buildings at Porolissum. First one was the temple of Palmyrene god Bel which was considered as transformed into a Christian Basilica in the 4th century after the Roman administration left Dacia. The allegation was not supported by any positive evidence and on this ground is rejected by the author of the present article. The second case is the shrine of goddess Nemesis identified based on an inscription under the stone stands of the amphitheater. The idea of a Christian martyrial church proposed cannot be accepted. The author demonstrates why it is impossible to imagine at Porolissum the existence of these Christian churches in the 4th century.

References:

[1] ARISTODEMOU 2016
G. ARISTODEMOU, Nemesis’ Cult and the Arena Spectacles: Evidence from the Black Sea Region. In: M. Manoledakis (Ed.), The Black Sea in the Light of New Archaeological Data and Theoretical Approaches. Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on the Black Sea in Antiquity Held in Thessaloniki 18–20 September 2015, (Oxford 2016), 181–204.

[2] BALDERSTONE 2007
S. BALDESTONE, Early Church Architectural Forms: A Theologically Context Typology for the Eastern Churches of the 4th –6th Centuries (Melbourne 2007).

[3] BAJUSZ 1992
I. BAJUSZ, Raport preliminar privind săpăturile arheologice executate la Porolissum în anii 1988–1991. Amfiteatrul, Acta Musei Porolissensis 16 (1992), 148–150, Pl. 15–22.

[4] BAJUSZ 2003
I. BAJUSZ, Amfiteatrul de la Porolissum și aspectele sale cultice. Acta Musei Porolissensis 25 (2003), 165–194.

[5] BENCZE 2018
U. BENCZE, The Abbey of Meszes: New Insights on the Site Location. In: D. Mérai, A. Drosztmér, K Lyublyanovics, J. Rasson, J. Papp Reed, A. Vadas, K Zatykó (Eds.), Genius loci Laszlovszki 60 (Budapest 2018), 68–71.

[6] BENEA 1999
D. BENEA, Dacia sud-vestică în secolele III-IV (Timișoara 1999).

[7] BENEA 2000
D. BENEA, Un posibil lăcaș de cult de la Porolissum. Studii de Istorie a Banatului 21–22 (1997–1998) [2000], 7–18.

[8] BENEA 2006
D. BENEA, Despre o capelă creștină la Porolissum. Peuce S. N. III-IV (2005–2006), 231–240.

[9] BOULEY 1990
E. BOULEY, Le culte de Némésis et les jeux de l’amphithéâtre dans les provinces balcaniques et danubiennes. In: C. Domergue, Ch. Landes, J.-M. Pailler (Ed.). Spectacula I Gladiateurs et amphithéâtres. Actes du colloque tenu à Toulouse at à Lattes les 26–29 mai 1987 (Lattes 1990), 241–251.

[10] BOWES 2014
K. BOWES, Christians in the Amphitheater? The “Christianization” of Spectacle Building and Martyrial Memory. Mélanges de l’École française de Rome. Moyen Âge 126–1 (2014), 93–114.

[11] BOWES/MITCHELL 2009
K. D. BOWES, J. MITCHELL, The Main Chapell of the Durres Amphitheater. Decoration and Chronology. Mélanges de l’École française de Rome. Antiquité 121–2 (2009), 571–597.

[12] CHZARNOVSKI 2014
L. CHZARNOVSKI, A nouveau sur le donarium de Biertan. In: S. Cociș (Hrsg.), Archāologische Beitrāge. Gedenkschrift zum hundertsten Geburtstag von Kurt Horedt (Cluj-Napoca 2014), 253–268.

[13] CUDORGE 2015
J. CUDORGE, La destruction des sanctuaires païens par les chretiens de Constantine a Justinien (Mont-Saint-Aignan 2015).

[14] DAICOVICIU 1935
C. DAICOVICIU, Există monumente creștine în Dacia traiană? Anuarul Institutului de Studii Clasice II (1933–1935), 192–209.

[15] GATHERCOLE 2015
S. GATHERCOLE, The Gospel of Jesus’ Wife: Constructing a Context. New Testament Studies 61–3 (2015), 292–313.

[16] GARTZONIKA 2009
E. GARTZONIKA, Martyrs and Their Holly Loci in the Balkan Peninsula: A Preliminary Historical-Geographical Approach. Nis and Byzantium VII (2009), 129–140.

[17] GĂZDAC/GUDEA 2006
C. GĂZDAC, N. GUDEA, Porolissum (Cluj-Napoca 2006) (Coins from Roman Sites and Collections of Roman Coins from Romania II).

[18] GORROCHATEGUI 2011
J. GORROCHATEGUI, Hic et nunc. Falcificationes contemporáneas. Il caso di Iruña-Veleia. In: J. Carbonell Manils, H. Gimeno Pascual, J. L. Moralejo Álvarez (Eds.), El monumento epigráfico in contextos secundarios. Procesos de reutilizatión, interpretatión y falsificatión (Bellaterra 2011), 241–261.

[19] GRAFTON 1997
A. GRAFTON, The Footnote: A Curious History (London 1997).

[20] GRAFTON 2010
A. GRAFTON, Donation of Constantine. In: A. Grafton, G. W Most, S. Settis (Eds.), The Classical Tradition (Cambridge, MA 2010), 280–281.

[21] GREGORI 1994
G. L. GREGORI, Opus Phidiae, Opus Praxitelis. In: L. Nista (Ed.), Castores. Imagine dei dioscuri a Roma (Roma 1994), 209–214.

[22] GUARDUCCI 1967
M. GUARDUCCI, Epigrafia greca 1 (Roma 1967).

[23] GUDEA 1979
N. GUDEA, Vasul cu inscripție creștină de la Moigrad. Contribuții la istoria creștinismului în Dacia după retragerea aureliană. Acta Musei Porolissensis III (1979), 515–524.

[24] GUDEA 1980
N. GUDEA, E. CHIRILĂ, AL. MATEI, V. LUCĂCEL, Raport preliminar asupra cercetărilor arheologice de la Mograd (Porolissum) din anii 1977–1979. Acta Musei Porolissensis IV (1980), 81–193.

[25] GUDEA 1989
N. GUDEA, Porolissum. Un complex arheologic daco-roman la marginea de nord a Imperiului Roman I (cercetări și descoperiri arheologice până în anul 1977). (Zalău 1989).

[26] GUDEA 1993
N. GUDEA, Vasul cu inscripție și simboluri creștine de la Moigrad. Contribuții la istoria creștinismului în Dacia după retragerea aureliană II. Interpretarea semnelor și textelor de pe partea exterioară a vasului. Studiu paleografic. Acta Musei Porolissensis XVII (1993), 151–184.

[27] GUDEA 2011
N. GUDEA, Christiana minora. Studii, articole și note în legaătură cu creștinismul timpuriu din Dacia romană, Dacia post romană și unele provincii vecine (Cluj-Napoca 2011).

[28] GUDEA 2016
N. GUDEA, Porolissum. Un focar al creștinismului timpuriu ân provincia Porolissensis (secolele II-III p. Chr.) și în epoca post-aureliană (secolele IV-VI p. Chr.) (Zalău 2016).

[29] GUDEA/GHIURCO 1988
N. GUDEA, I. GHIURCO, Din istoria creștinismului la români. Mărturii arheologice (Oradea 1988).

[30] HOPKINS 1998
K. HOPKINS, Christian Number and Its Implications. Journal of Early Christian Studies 6. 2 (1998), 185–226.

[40] HOREDT 1982
K. HOREDT, Siebenbürgen in spātrömischer Zeit (Bukarest 1982).

[41] JAMES 2019
S. JAMES, The Roman Military base at Dura-Europos, Syria: an Archaeological Vizualization (Oxford 2019).

[42] KAIZER 2016
T. KAIZER, Revisiting the “temple of Bel” at Dura-Europos: a note on the fragmentary fresco from the naos. In: Icon, Cult and Context: sacred spaces and objects in the Classical World. Essays in Honor of Susan B. Downey (Los Angeles 2016), 35–46.

[43] KOVÁCS 2003
P. KOVÁCS, Christianity and the Greek Language in Pannonia. Acta Antiqua Academiae Scientiarum Hungariae 43 (2003), 113–124.

[44] LORENZ 2008
B. LORENZ, Scientific/Critical Historiography. In: A. Tucker (Ed.), Blackwell Companion to Philosophy of History and Historiography (Oxford 2008), 398–408.

[45] MATEI 1979
AL. V. MATEI, Repertoriul de așezări și descoperiri aparținând sec. IV-IX de pe teritoriul județului Sălaj. Acta Musei Porolissensis 3, 1979, 475–513.

[46] MATEI 1980
N. GUDEA, E. CHIRILĂ, AL. MATEI, V. LUCĂCEL, Raport preliminar asupra cercetărilor arheologice de la Moigrad (Porolissum) din anii 1977–1979. Acta Musei Porolissensis IV, 1980, 81–193.

[47] MELL 2010
U. MELL, Christliche Hauskirche und Neues Testament. Die Ikonographie des Baptisteriums von Dura Europos und das Diatessaron Tatianus (Göttingen 2010).

[48] MOMIGLIANO 2016
A. MOMIGLIANO, “The Rules of the Game in the Study of Ancient History”. History and Memory 55 (February 2016), 39–45 (translated by Kenneth W. Yu).

[49] OPREANU/TALOȘ 2020
C. H. OPREANU, F. TALOȘ, The Cult Complex of Bel at Porolissum. A Historical and Architectural Perspective. Ephemeris Napocensis 30 (2020), 101–136.

[50] ORLANDI/CALDELLI/GREGORI 2015
S. ORLANDI, M. L. CALDELLI, G. L. GREGORI, Forgeries and Fakes. In: C. Bruun, J. Edmondson, The Oxford Handbook of Roman Epigraphy (Oxford 2015), 42–65.

[51] PARK 2012
D. B. PARK, Dante and the Donation of Constantine. Dante Studies CXXX, 2012, 67–161.

[52] PEPPARD 2016
M. PEPPARD, The World’s Oldest Church. Bible, Art, and Ritual at Dura-Europos, Syria (New Haven-London 2016).

[53] RODRIGUEZ-TEMIÑO 2017
I. RODRIGUEZ-TEMIÑO, The “Exceptional Finds” of Iruña-Veleia (Álava): Syntax of an Archaeological Forgery. Zephyrus LXXIX (enero-junio 2017), 197–217.

[54] RODRIGUEZ-TEMIÑO/ YÁÑEZ 2021
I. RODRIGUEZ-TEMIÑO, A YÁÑEZ, Conciderationes acerca de la sentencia de junio de 2020 sobre el caso de “Iruña-Veleia”. In: K. Lennartz (ed.), De falsa et vera historia. Estudios sobre pseudoépigrafos y falcificaciones textuales antiguas 4 (Madrid 2021), 403–414.

[55] RUSU 1991
M. RUSU, Paleocreștinismul în Dacia romană. Ephemeris Napocensis 1 (1991), 81–112.

[56]SENA/WANNER 2016
E. C. DE SENA, R. WANNER, Construction History and Lifeways in the Civilian Settlement of Porolissum as Observed in Area 22 of the Porolissum Forum Project. Acta Musei Porolissensis 38 (2016), 305–328.

[57] TAMBA 2008
D. TAMBA, Un complex daco-roman la marginea de nord a Imperiului roman 4. Așezarea civilă (vicusul militar) a castrului mare de la Porolissum (Cluj-Napoca 2008).

[58] VAGENHEIM 2011
G. VAGENHEIM, La falsificazione epigrafica nell’Italia della seconda metà del Cinquecento. Renovatio et inventio nelle Antichità Romane attribuite a Pirro Ligorio. In: J. Carbonell Manils, H. Gimeno Pascual, J. L. Moralejo Álvarez (Eds.), El monumento epigráfico in contextos secundarios. Procesos de reutilizatión, interpretatión y falsificatión (Bellaterra 2011), 217–226.

Browse by

Author
Title

News

The latest issue of Ephemeris Napocensis is now available in electronic format.

Contact:

INSTITUTUL DE ARHEOLOGIE ŞI ISTORIA ARTEI
M. Kogălniceanu 12-14,
400084 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
Phone: 0040 264 591125;
Fax: 0040 264 594470;

e-mail:

choprean@yahoo.com ephemerisnapocensis@gmail.com

ISSN: 1220-5249

Our journal adheres to the DOAJ definition of open access. More about our open access, licence and copyright terms is available here

Our journal simultaneously adheres to the guidelines described in the Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing. More about our policy towards publication integrity here.

Creative Commons License
The content of this journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

ERIH+ Academia Română Filiala Cluj-Napoca